Published Date: 01.01.2024
Using a Self-Assessment Tool to Analyze the Educational Effect of Distance Learning Programs
Annotation
Self-esteem is an unreliable outcome of educational progress, according to some studies. Among the main disadvantages of self-assessment, the authors name the progressiveness of the social expediency factor and the lack of objectivity of the data compared to knowledge tests. However, there is evidence which show that a trained evaluator can effectively use selfassessment as a tool for assessing educational impact. The ability to adequately self-assess is an important quality of any specialist. Self-assessment can be an effective tool for analyzing the progress of students in the implementation of distance learning programs. In this case, not only the target qualities themselves (knowledge, skills, competencies), but also the skill of their critical assessment can act as evaluation criteria.
| Type | Article |
| Information | WORLD OF PSYCHOLOGY № 01/2024 |
| Pages | 80-91 |
| UDK | 159.9 |
| DOI | 10.51944/20738528_2024_1_80 |
Library
1. 19. Kuehn, S. A. Computer-mediated communication in instructional settings : A research agenda / S. A. Kuehn // Communication Education. — 1994. — Vol. 43, № 2. — P. 171–183. — DOI: 10.1080/03634529409378974
2. 20. Notar, C. E. Distant learning for the development of higher-level cognitive skills / C. E. Notar, J. D. Wilson, K. G. Ross // Education. — 2002. — Vol. 122, № 4. — P. 642–648.
3. 21. Pajares, F. Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings / F. Pajares // Review of Educational Research. — 1996. — Vol. 66, № 4. — P. 543–578.
4. 22. Pallier, G. Gender differences in the self-assessment of accuracy on cognitive tasks / G. Pallier // Sex Roles. — 2003. — Vol. 48, № 5/6. — P. 265–76.
5. 23. Panadero, E. The future of student self-assessment : A review of known unknowns and potential directions / E. Panadero, G. T. L. Brown, J. W. Strijbos // Educational Psychology Review. — 2016. — Vol. 28, № 4. — P. 803–830.
6. 24. Panadero, E. Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy : Four meta-analyses / E. Panadero, A. Jonsson, J. Botella // Educational Research Review. — 2017. — Vol. 22. — P. 74–98.
7. 25. Relationships between student characteristics and self-peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations / A. M. Langan, D. M. Shuker, W. R. Cullen [et al.] // Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. — 2008. — Vol. 33, № 2. — P. 179–90.
8. 26. Ross, J. A. The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment / J. A. Ross // Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation. — 2006. — Vol. 11, № 10. — Р. 1–13.
9. 27. Self-grading and peer-grading for formative and summative assessments in 3rd through 12th grade classrooms : A meta-analysis / C. E. Sanchez, K. M. Atkinson, A. C. Koenka [et al.] // Journal of Educational Psychology. — 2017. — Vol. 109, № 8. — P. 104
10. 28. Sellnow, D. D. The role of gender in perceived speaker competence : An analysis of student peer critiques / D. D. Sellnow, K. P. Treinen // Communication Education. — 2004. — Vol. 53, № 3. — P. 286–96.
11. 29. Sfenrianto, S. E-Learning Effectiveness Analysis in Developing Countries : East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia Perspective / S. Sfenrianto, E. Tantrisna, H. Akbar // Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics. — 2018. — Vol. 7, № 3. — P. 417–424. —
12. 30. Student self-assessment: why do they do it? / Zi Yan, G. Brown, C.-K. Lee, X.-L. Qiu // Educational Psychology. — 2020. — Vol. 40, № 4. — P. 509–532. — DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2019.1672038
13. 31. The effects of technical difficulties on learning and attrition during online training / T. Sitzmann, K. Ely, B. S. Bell, K. N. Bauer // Journal of Experimental Psychology : Applied. — 2010. — Vol. 16, № 3. — P. 281–292.
14. 32. Ward, M. Measuring self-assessment : Current state of the art / M. Ward, L. Gruppen, G. Regehr // Advances in Health Sciences Education. — 2002. — Vol. 7, № 1. — P. 63–80.
15. 33. Yan, Zi. The self-assessment practices of Hong Kong secondary students: Findings with a new instrument / Zi Yan // Journal of Applied Measurement. — 2016. — Vol. 17, № 3. — P. 335–353.
16. 34. Yan, Zi. A cyclical self-assessment process : Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment / Zi Yan, G. T. L. Brown // Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. — 2017. — Vol. 42, № 8. — P. 1247–1262.
17. 1. Andrade, H. Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment / H. Andrade, A. Valtcheva // Theory into Practice. — 2009. — Vol. 48, № 1. — P. 12–19.
18. 2. Andrade, H. Feedback in the context of self-assessment / H. Andrade // Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback / ed. by A. Lipnevich, J. Smith. — Cambridge, 2018. — P. 376–408.
19. 3. Ashforth, B. E. Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning : Integrating socialization models / B. E. Ashforth, D. M. Sluss, A. M. Saks // Journal of Vocational Behavior. — 2007. — Vol. 70, № 3. — P. 447–462.
20. 4. Boud, D. Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher-education : A critical analysis of findings / D. Boud, N. Falchikov // Higher Education. — 1989. — Vol. 18, № 5. — P. 529–549.
21. 5. Boud, D. Avoiding the traps : Seeking good practice in the use of self-assessment and reflection in professional courses / D. Boud // Social Work Education. — 1999. — Vol. 18, № 2. — P. 121–132.
22. 6. Boud, D. Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgement over time? / D. Boud, R. Lawson, D. G. Thompson // Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. — 2013. — Vol. 38, № 8. — P. 941–956.
23. 7. Brown, G. T. L. Student self-assessment / G. T. L. Brown, L. R. Harris // The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment / ed. by J. H. McMillan. — Thousand Oaks, 2013. — P. 367–393.
24. 8. Brown, G. T. L. The future of self-assessment in classroom practice : Reframing self-assessment as a core competency / G. T. L. Brown, L. R. Harris // Frontline Learning Research. — 2014. — Vol. 2, № 1. — P. 22–30.
25. 9. Comparing Student Satisfaction with Distance Education to Traditional Classrooms in Higher Education : A Meta-Analysis / M. Allen, J. Bourhis, N. Burrell, E. Mabry // The American Journal of Distance Education. — 2002. — Vol. 16, № 2. — P. 83–97. — DOI
26. 10. Computer-Mediated communication and the online classroom / ed. by Z. L. Berge, M. P. Collins. — Cresskill, NJ : Hampton Press, 1995. — Vol. 1. Overview and perspectives. — 250 p.
27. 11. De Grez, L. How effective are self- and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessments? / L. De Grez, M. Valcke, I. Roozen // Active Learning in Higher Education. — 2012. — Vol. 13, № 2. — P. 129–42.
28. 12. Distant Learning : Open Challenges and Evolution / F. Ferri, A. D’Andrea, P. Grifoni, T. Guzzo // International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. — 2018. — Vol. 17, № 8. — P. 78–88. — DOI: 10.26803/ijlter.17.8.5
29. 13. Falchikov, N. Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education : A Meta-Analysis / N. Falchikov, D. Boud // Review of Educational Research. — 1989. — Vol. 59, № 4. — P. 395–430.
30. 14. González-Betancor, S. M. Self-assessment accuracy in higher education : The influence of gender and performance of university students / S. M. González-Betancor, A. Bolívar-Cruz, D. Verano-Tacoronte // Active Learning in Higher Education. — 2017. — Vo
31. 15. Higher Education during the Pandemic : The Predictive Factors of Learning Effectiveness in COVID-19 Online Learning / J. T. Y. Tsang, M. K. P. So, A. C. Y. Chong [et al.] // Education Sciences. — 2021. — Vol. 11, № 8. — P. 446–461. — DOI: 10.3390/ edu
32. 16. Hiltz, S. R. The virtual classroom : Learning without limits via computer networks / S. R. Hiltz. — Norwood, NJ : Ablex Publishing, 1994. — 408 p.
33. 17. Ibabe, I. Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge / I. Ibabe, J. Jauregizar // Higher Education. — 2010. — Vol. 59, № 2. — P. 243–258.
The full version of the article is available only to subscribers of the journal